Duterte's allies reject former cop's testimony over death squad
23 Feb 2017 - 1:14
Manila: Philippine senators allied with President Rodrigo Duterte (pictured) sought yesterday to block a retired policeman from testifying that Duterte had once operated a "death squad", dismissing the former policeman as a liar.
The retired policeman, Arturo Lascanas, said on Monday he had been a ringleader of a death squad run by Duterte when he was mayor of the southern city of Davao.
His confession contradicted testimony he had given to a Senate inquiry last year, during which he said no such death squad existed.
But on Monday, Lascanas said the death squad started operating when Duterte became mayor of Davao in 1988, and members got cash and orders from Duterte to kill criminals.
Duterte has not commented on the allegations though he has denied similar accusations in the past. His legal counsel, Salvador Panelo, said the allegations were a "continuing fabrication" and "another false narration".
A prominent critic of Duterte, Senator Antonio Trillanes, has called for Lascanas to give testimony to a Senate inquiry, but Duterte's allies rejected that.
"This is not the proper forum for this man who has lied," Senator Richard Gordon told the assembly.
"No one should be allowed to trifle with the senate insofar as the truth in concerned."
The Senate committee on justice, which Gordon heads, last year found no proof that a Davao death squad existed or that killings that had taken place when Duterte was mayor, and since he became president in June, were state sponsored.
Human rights groups have documented about 1,400 suspicious killings in Davao while Duterte was mayor and critics say the war on drugs he unleashed when he became president has the same hallmarks.
More than 7,700 people have been killed since June, about 2,500 in what police say are shootouts during raids and sting operations. Most of the rest are under investigation.
Philippine boxing champion Manny Pacquiao, also a senator and a Duterte ally, said allowing Lascanas to testify again would set a precedent that "a witness can just lie and just change his testimony".