“Wait and see” no longer an option for disaster response: IFRC chief
18 Jan 2017 - 20:52
By Astrid Zweynert / Thomson Reuters Foundation
LONDON: Governments need to step up efforts in preparing for disasters to cut the rising bill for helping people hit by crises, the head of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) said.
Even though droughts, storms, floods and other disasters are predictable, most disaster funding only becomes available after they happen, said the IFRC’s secretary general Elhadj As Sy.
“We see much more money being spent in responding to disasters and very little in preventing them,” Sy told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in an interview.
In the latest example of a humanitarian crisis that has been looming for months, the U.N. appealed for $864 million on Tuesday for Somalia, saying the Horn of Africa country risks slipping back into famine as a worsening drought has left millions without food, water or healthcare.
Sy said a fresh approach to funding is critical as humanitarian needs have grown exponentially over the past decade and are expected to keep rising.
The number of people who rely on humanitarian assistance has more than tripled while the cost of responding as increased six-fold, according to the IFRC.
PREPAREDNESS PAYS OFF
Research in Kenya and Ethiopia has shown early drought preparedness is on average three times more cost-effective than emergency response, while other studies calculated disaster risk reduction globally saves an average $4 for every $1 invested.
“We all have the figures...but nonetheless, it is so difficult to convince governments and funders to invest in a crisis they have not seen yet,” Sy said.
Spending on preparedness and resilience remains low, despite a U.N. call for governments to spend at least 1 percent of development aid by 2020 on reducing the risks of disasters and preparing for them, up from around 0.5 percent now.
Sy cited the Philippines as an example where efforts to improve preparedness by working with communities have paid off.
When Typhoon Nock-ten hit the Philippines in December it had the potential to be as deadly as Haiyan, the storm that killed more than 6,300 people and wrought havoc in the southeast Asian country in 2013.
Nock-ten killed just three people, according to government data released in early January, after almost half a million people were pre-emptively evacuated, and thanks to extensive preparedness programmes introduced after the Haiyan disaster.
Forecast-based financing schemes, which link hazard warnings with appropriate funding, are critical in helping to curb future harm of disasters, Sy said.
Weather forecasts and other scientific methods have become increasingly sophisticated in predicting weather-related hazards months in advance.
“We can even see with a certain degree of accuracy that there will be a cycle of droughts in the Sahel as well as in eastern and southern Africa,” Sy said.
The Red Cross movement has been experimenting with forecast-based financing in Uganda and beyond, releasing funding to communities according to agreed triggers such as weather predictions rather than waiting for dry spells or torrential rains to cause havoc.
This can include distributing chlorine tablets ahead of a flood instead of treating patients once contaminated water causes a disease as well as stockpiling food and other supplies.
(Reporting by Astrid Zweynert; Editing by Ros Russell)